|
|
Restructuring any company is a tough.
However, for Motorola the year 2008 has been a disaster. Between the recession
and its own (pre-recession) plans to restructure the company falling apart, the
year 2008 has not been kind to Motorola.
Motorola’s(NYSE:MOT) China contract is the break the company needs to
rally around some good news. The China contract is a solid way for Motorola(NYSE:MOT) to re- establish itself in China. The company has
been doing business in the country for at least 15 years so getting the contract
was not as hard as most investment bankers believe. However, anyone ever having
done business in China knows that the contract award to Motorola(NYSE:MOT) still took some doing on the part of
Motorola.
Thank goodness China is such a huge marketplace. True, the
country is getting hammered with this global recession but the market is still
huge and now is the time to position a company in this marketplace. China is a
large enough market to enable telecom companies to nab small contracts. The
contracts are small sub-billion dollars but still large enough to keep cash
flowing through vendors like Alcatel(NYX:ALU) and Motorola. The year 2009 will be tough even for
China. However, as I have said many times before, the 2009 goals for all
telecom companies are to focus on cash flow even minimal cash flow and to
position themselves for an emergence from the recession in late 2010.
The
challenge for Motorola(NYSE:MOT) is surviving the next 20 months. To generate cash,
it will need to win small contracts. Until the recession is over, companies
like Motorola(NYSE:MOT) wi ll need to engage the carriers continually;
addressing both large and small contracts. Large contracts will take some work
to win but smaller contracts will be easier to sign quickly.
Until this recession is over the most any company can expect are illusory
promises of future business from the carriers. Investors need to keep an eye
open for a contractual construct called the “master service agreement” also
called the “general purchase agreement”. The master service agreement/general
purchase agreement is contractual construct that many carriers use to close
deals with vendors. The agreement does not bind the carrier to any specific
monetary purchase level. In other words, when you hear a vendor has signed a
billion dollar contract, it does not mean the carrier is required to spend a
billion dollars but has promised to buy equipment and that the levels may be as
high as a billion dollars. This is how the carriers do business and quite
frankly it makes sense; it is all part of the carriers’ process of managing
quality from a vendor; money spent is tied to equipment performance. Most of
the contracts also give the carriers to decide not spend any money – effectively
the contract places the vendor on a short list of approved suppliers. The
contract construct effectively keeps the vendors’ feet to the fire. Not a bad
thing for the carriers. In the case of Motorola(NYSE:MOT) it may help focus the company's restructuring
efforts.
Investors will need to keep an eye open because despite the news
the vendors will not net as much money as you hope. As I always say; “investors
do your diligence” and “understand the information the company has provided
you”.
P.J. Louis LLC is an independent advisory and turnaround firm providing
operational restructuring leadership to companies and their stakeholders. We
serve clients in the telecommunications, technology, Internet, media, and
network security industries with creative solutions and ideas that enhance
corporate value during adverse periods.
P.J. Louis LLC possesses in-depth
expertise in operational and technology management. Our expertise enables us to
manage due diligence efforts that only professionals with deep insight in the
industry can perform.
The firm views intellectual property as a key
component of any technology company’s value. Companies need to find new ways of
generating value out of their intellectual property portfolios – our firm is
dedicated to making that happen.
We support private equity investors and
creditors. We support USPTO patent re-examinations. We support intellectual
property attorneys in patent infringement and copyright infringement
litigations.
For more information,
see: www.pjlouis.com |
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily represent
the views of MobileIN.com.
|
|