|
|
| The business case does not exist at the hotspot level. Where it may exist
is for wider free use deployments such as city deployments |
WiFi vs. WiMax
Comparing WiMax to WiFi is akin to
comparing apples to oranges. Initially it’s easy to see why the comparison
would exist, as most people think WiMax is merely a more robust version of
WiFi. Indeed they are both wireless broadband technologies, but they differ in
the technical execution and ultimately their business case is very different. In
addition to the technical differences that exist, the marketplace difference is
that equipment is more or less non-existent for WiMax and certainly not geared
towards a residential environment with very high pricing to be expected. It
will take at least 2 years to see equipment of mass market uptake pricing.
WiMax will not be commercially
available until the second half of 2005, and even then at a very controlled
level. This is primarily due to standardization issues. In fact, it won’t be
until 2006 that a robust production and implementation will happen due to the
ramp-up period for manufacturers. This is certainly one challenge to the
widespread adoption of WiMax. Additionally, WiMax will have issues of pricing,
and will remain far more expensive than WiFi. WiMax will be primarily adopted
by businesses to replace or displace DSL, and offices that want to cover a lot
of territory without entering the world of endless repeaters that are necessary
with the 802.11 technologies. It will take some time (2 years) for WiMax to
significantly reduce its price-point for residential uptake. WiMax will not displace WiFi in the home
because WiFi is advancing in terms of speed and technology. Each year brings a
new variant to the 802.11 area with various improvements.
Additionally, for commercial deployment, frequency allocation will be an
issue. With the three dominant communications players controlling the best
frequencies, it will be hard to get the type of traction needed with the
remaining companies operating in the frequencies available. WiMax will
become extremely robust and displace WiFi as the deployment of choice for
commercial deployments, but that won’t even begin until the end of 2006.
Based upon the number of public hotspots already deployed, WiMax will not
be chosen to replace those as they are up and running adequately and personnel
involved understand how to work with the technology. The business case
does not exist at the hotspot level. Where it may exist is for wider free
use deployments such as city deployments (free ones) and other government
sponsored or carrier sponsored (with ultra inexpensive pricing for consumers)
deployments. If this happens then its not only WiFi that will be displaced,
but cable and DSL will also lose a percentage of their subscriber base.
What will cause the displacement is the consumer’s proven desire for a
bundled package.
|
|